Abbott, M. and Daucouliagos, C. 2003. The efficiency of Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review, 22: 89-97.

Agha, S.R., Kuhair, I., Abdul Nabi N. Salem, M. and Ghanim, A. 2011. Assessment of academic departments efficiency using data enevelopment analysis,Journal of industrial engineering and Management, 4(2): 301-325.

Ahn, T. 1987. Efficiency and related issues in higher education: a data envelopment analysis approach. PhD thesis, the University of Texas at Austine.

Avkiran, N. 2002. Productivity Analysis in the Service Sector. Australia: N. K. Avkiran Publisher.

Avkiran, N.K. 2001. Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1): 57–80.

Aziz, N.A., Janor, R.M. and Mahadi, R. 2013. Comparative Department Efficiency Analysis within a University: A DEA Approach, Procedia-Social Behavioural Sciences, 90: 540-548.

Bagoury, A.S. 2013. DEA to evaluate efficiency of African higher education, Wyno Academic Journal of Education Research and Essays, 1(4): 39-46.

Bangi, Y.I. 2014. Efficiency assessment of Tanzanian private universities: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), International Journal of Education and Research, 2(5): 455-470.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring efficiency of decision-making units.

Cooper, W. and Seiford, L. 2001. K. Tone (2000); Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models. Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software: Kluwer Academic Publishing, Boston et al. European Journal of Operational Research, 2: 429–444.

Halkas, G.E., Tzeremes, N.G. and Kourtzidis, S.A. 2010. A DEA approach for measuring university department’s efficiency. (MPRA), Munich Personal RcPEc Archive, No.24029, pp.1-26

Johnes, G. and Johnes, J. 1993. Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: An application of data envelopment analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 45.

Joreskog, K.G. 2002. Censored variable and censored regression, Goldberger (1964, p. 253) in analog with Probit model.

Kao, C. and Hung, H.T. 2008. Efficiency analysis of University departments: An empirical study. Omega, 36(4): 653-664.

Kounetas, K. et al. 2011. Departmental efficiency differences within a Greek university: An application of a DEA and Tobit analysis, International Transactions in Operational Research, 18: 545-559.

Martine, E. 2003. An application of the Data envelopment analysis methodology in the performance assessment of the Zaragoza University departments, Documetos de trabajo, 6(1).

Moreno, A. and Tadepalli, R. 2002. Assessing Academic Department Efficiency a Public University. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23(7): 385-397.

Ramanathan, R. 2003. An introduction to data envelopment analysis: A tool for performance measurement, New Delhi, Sage Publication

Selim, S. and Bursalioglu, S.A. 2013. Analysis of the determinants of Universities efficiency in Turkey: Application of the data envelopment analysis and panel Tobit model, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89: 895-900.

Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. 1998. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models, Management Science, 44(1): 49-60.

Sharma, M. and Mehra, A. and Meenakshi Sharma 2017. “Dynamics of Higher Education in Punjab”, International Journal of Management ‘ANVESHAK’, 6(1): 76-91.

Sharma, M. and Mehra, A. 2019. “Growth of Higher Education in India- Opportunities and Challenges”, International Journal of Scientific Research and Review, 7(3).

Sharma, M. and Mehra, A. 2019. “Working of State Universities in Punjab: An Exploratory Report”, The Journal of Institute of Public Enterprises, 12(1&2).

Tomkins, C. and Green, R. 1988. An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting. Financial Accountability & Management, 4(2): 147–164.

Tyagi, P., Yadav, S.P. and Singh, S.P. 2009. Relative performance of academic departments using DEA with sensitivity analysis, Evaluation and Program Planning, 32: 168-177.