Original Article

Conservation Priorities for Indian Goat Breeds Based on Microsatellite and Analytical Data

Year: 2020 | Month: June | Volume 10 | Issue 3

References (26)

Anonymous, breed wise information published by Indian J. Anim. Sci., pp. 77-83.

View at Google Scholar

Bennewitz, J., Eding H., Ruane, J. and Simianer, H. 2007. Strategies for moving from conservation to utilization. In: K. Oldenbroek, ed. Utilization and conservation of farm animal genetic resources. 131–146. Wageningen, the Netherlands, Wageningen Academic Publishers.

View at Google Scholar

Boettcher, P., Tixier-Boichard, M., Toro, M.A., Simianer, H., Eding, H., Gandini, G., Joost, S., Garcia, D., Colli, L., Ajmone-Marsan, P. and Globaldiv Consortium, 2010. Objectives, criteria and methods for using molecular genetic data in priority setting for conservation of animal genetic resources. Anim. Genet., 41: 64–77.

View at Google Scholar

Carson, A., Elliott, Groom. J., Winter. A. and Bowles, D. 2009. Geographical isolation of native sheep breeds in the U.K evidence of endemism as a risk factor to genetic resources. Livest. Sci., 123(2-3): 288–299.

View at Google Scholar

Cervantes, I., Pastor, J. M., Gutierrez, J.P., Goyache, F. and Molina, A. 2011. Computing effective population size from molecular data: The case of three rare Spanish ruminant populations. Livest. Sci., 138: 202–206.

View at Google Scholar

Cuc, N.T.K., Weigend, S., Tieu, H.V. and Simianer, H. 2011. Conservation priorities and optimum allocation of conservation funds for Vietnamese local chicken breeds. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 128: 284–294.

View at Google Scholar

DADF, 2014, 19th Livestock Census 2012. All India Report published by Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.

View at Google Scholar

DADF, 2015. Estimated Livestock Population Breed-wise based on Breed Survey, 2013. Published by Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.

View at Google Scholar

FAO, 2000. World watch list for domestic animal diversity, 3rd ed., Rome, 2000, http://www.fao.org/dad-is/.

View at Google Scholar

FAO, 2013. In vivo conservation of animal genetic resources. FAO, Animal Production and Health Guidelines. No. 14. Rome.

View at Google Scholar

Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Addison-Wesley.

View at Google Scholar

Gandini, G., Ollivier, L., Danell, B., Distl, O., Georgoudis, A., Groeneveld, E., Martyniuk, E., Van Arendonk, J.A.M. and Wolliams, J.A. 2004. Criteria to assess the degree of endangerment of livestock breeds in Europe. Livest. Prod. Sci., 91: 173–182.

View at Google Scholar

Gizaw, S., Komen, H., Windig, J.J., Hanotte, O. and Van Arendonk, J.A.M. 2008. Conservation priorities for Ethiopian sheep breeds combining threat status breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity. Genet. Sel. Evol., 40: 433–447.

View at Google Scholar

Hill, W.G. 1981. Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet. Res., 38: 209–216.

View at Google Scholar

Leroy, G., Verrier, E., Meriaux, J.C. and Rognon, X. 2009. Genetic diversity of dog breeds: between-breed diversity, breed assignation and conservation approaches. Anim. Genet., 40(3): 333-343

View at Google Scholar

Meuwissen, T.H.E. 2009. Towards consensus on how to measure neutral genetic diversity? J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 126: 333– 334.

View at Google Scholar

Monomorph breed wise no. 11, 14, 29, 42, 57, 58, 60, 64, 67, 75, 76 published by National Bureau of Animal Genetics Resources, Karnal-132001.

View at Google Scholar

Network project reports on Animal genetic resource published by National Bureau of Animal Genetics Resources, Karnal-132001.

View at Google Scholar

NATP project reports on Animal Genetic Resource published by ICAR, New Delhi.

View at Google Scholar

Pinent, Tamina. 2009. Concept for planning conservation schemes for farm animal genetic diversity focused on German chicken breeds. Thesis submitted to Gottingen Centre for Biodiversity and Ecology.

View at Google Scholar

Ruane, J. 1999. A critical review of the value of genetic distances in conservation of animal genetic resources. J. Anim. Breed Genet., 116: 317–323.

View at Google Scholar

Reist-Marti, S.B., Simianer, H., Gibson, J., Hanotte, O. and Rege, J.E.O. 2003. Weitzman’s approach and conservation of breed diversity: an application to African Cattle breeds. Conserv. Biol., 17(5): 1299–1311.

View at Google Scholar

Waples, R.S. 2006. A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci. Conserv. Genet., 7: 167–184.

View at Google Scholar

Waples, R.S. and Do, C. 2008. LdNe: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 8: 753–756.

View at Google Scholar

Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genet., 16: 97–159.

View at Google Scholar

Zander, K.K., Drucker, A.G., Holm-Müller, K. and Simianer, H. 2009. Choosing the “cargo” for Noah’s Ark –applying the Metrick-Weitzman theorem to Borana cattle. Ecol. Econ., 68: 2051–2057.

View at Google Scholar

Economic Affairs, Quarterly Journal of Economics| In Association with AESSRA

78723162 - Visitors since February 20, 2019